News

Jigsolve: Improved hoses

Yesterday I went to NEWLINE hose & fittings in Burnaby, Canada, and picked up some new parts. The old model was the clear vynyl tubing and then a bearing to let just the tip rotate. Air was leaking through the two rings of the bearing. That made the suction at the tip too weak to pick up a jigsaw piece.

I suspect the final mechanism is going to be too large for the CNC head I’ve got. Lesson learned: get the tool designed first, THEN build the gantry that will hold the tool? No… that’s close…

When building a machine, I start by defining the goal, then work backwards from there. I needed a machine that would pick up jigsaw pieces and move them around from the internet. So the first thing I did was pick out a table for the jigsaw pieces, then build the biggest CNC I could on that table. Anyone else see how that’s backwards? Yeah. Looking back on it, it’s obvious.

So if I’m doing this the right way around, the immediate next goal is to get a nozzle on the end of this 1/8″ NTP brass 90 degree connector, and assert that it can pick up a jigsaw piece with the pump I have. Then build a mechanism A to rotate the nozzle. Then build a mechanism B to raise/lower mechanism A. Then attach that to the CoreXY. Etc, etc.

While I was there I learned about the threading on the 1/8″ NTP connectors. First off, the ones above are 27 teeth-per-inch, which we figured out with a Thread Gauge, a tool I’d never seen before. Neat! Also, the air-tight seal between two components is possible because the depth of the thread is tapered – as the parts are screwed together the fit becomes tighter. I was advised to tighten until I meet resistance and then give it an extra 1/4 turn.

The change to the milky white silicone tubing is to allow more flex when the nozzle tip rotates. I’m basing this choice off the uArm.

I’m also going to copy their idea for a rotation system, using some 3D printed parts to hold the brass fitting at the end of the tube on a hobby servo. Then all that will go on a second servo to raise and lower the mechanism, and the camera will be as close as possible to the lifter, which still having a view of the nozzle.

I’m going to try to make some nozzles that are all 1/8″ NTP at one end and different inner and outer diameters at the far end. For example, a nozzle for SMT components might be 1mm ID and 3mm OD. A jigsaw piece might need 3mm ID and 10mm OD, forming a wide flat suction cup.

Here is where I have a question for you:

Is it more efficient to

(A) make a few different designs at once and pick the best fit or

(B) make one, test, repeat until best found

?

News

Jigsolve: Pics so far

First posts about the Jigsolve began appearing on hackaday.io in January of 2016, but work had been ongoing for several months before that.

Overview seems to drive pretty well, as long as the acceleration is kept low.

Latest head design is an experiment to make the original head more stable.

View this post on Instagram

Closer…

A post shared by Marginally Clever Robots (@imakerobots) on

Corner brackets 1 and 2

View this post on Instagram

It fits! …that's what she said…

A post shared by Marginally Clever Robots (@imakerobots) on

Original head design

plus in progress one, two, and three

Jigsolve

Jigsolve: iterating on gantry design

The suction is tested; the up/down is tested; the rotation is tested. Now the working head has to be mounted on the gantry, which is forcing @lethic to redesign the side carriages:

and then make the corner mounts of the gantry change to match as well. Both have to be changed before we can test. It’s not a one-at-a-time kind of deal. Boo!

So! We have progress, which is nice. I have to resurrect the IRC bot and check all that software that was ready a year ago is still working. I’m also trying to make a new jigsaw puzzle that won’t have the tight fitting pieces, as well as organize a collaboration with an art gallery or science museum to host our robot while the “game” is running. (I lost the game.)


Somehow I’ve gone from being a person who makes robots to a person who talks about the awesome robots he is paying other people to make. Is that a step up? Only if I can find a way to do it even more.

Jigsolve

Jigsolve: testing piece separation

Yesterday eve LZ and I printed springs made from ABS and cobbled together a springing ring. Ideally the spring holds the jigsaw down while the target piece is being added/removed.

So far it looks like the suction power of the air pump fails before the springs or the jigsaw separates. Back to the drawing board!

Please like, share, and subscribe!

News

Jigsolve: tested rotation, picking, and placing

Controlled rotation, picking, and placing demonstrated. I’ve built a Z axis with a linear actuator and have not tested it yet.

I’m now building and testing a spring loaded mechanism that keeps neighbor pieces on the table when the current piece is inserted or removed.

If you’re enjoying this robot coming together please tell instagram to put me on their robots channel so I can bring this kind of cool stuff to more eyeballs.

“Hi @Instagram! Please put @i-make-robots on your #robots channel. Thank you!”

Thank you in advance for sharing with your friends and following along. Your support keeps me strong!