skylarthegrey

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Skycam attempt, issues with planar movements #29254
    skylarthegrey
    Participant

    Hi Dan, Thanks for the updated comments!

    One further clarification, it seems to follow that ((a-h)/2,(a-i)/2,a-c)-(-(a-h)/2,-(a-i)/2,0) therefore define the limits for M101? Would in that case
    #define SKYCAM_MOTOR_SIZE (0.0f)
    and setting limits to the measured anchor bounds rather than frame bounds be equivalent? Just trying to check I understand the parameter intent (basically to shrink the XY limit space).

    //    i---------------j
    //   /               /|
    //  /               / |
    // a--b         g--h  |
    // |   \       /   |  |
    // |    \     /    |  |
    // |     \   /     |  k
    // |      fff      | /
    // |               |/
    // c-------d-------e

    Edit: hopefully code tags fix the image

    • This reply was modified 3 years, 11 months ago by skylarthegrey.
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)